Join for FREE | Take the Tour Lost Password?

deviantART

 
:iconthe-invisible:

=tHe-iNviSibLe

The latest war to end all wars
ProfileGalleryPrintsFavesJournal
Wears a tinfoil hat

Breaking Dumb and the Evacuation of Switzerland

Journal Entry: Thu Aug 7, 2008, 2:18 AM
theinvisible

theinvisible

Pretty much says it all, doesn't it...

I'm at a bit of a loss for what to do. I felt a similar feeling when I finished reading Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, but mainly because it was such a huge part of my childhood that was coming to an end. I feel a bit hollow at the thought that I might not be able to follow the rest of Bella's story and there's no childish attachment to blame for it. I get the feeling I'd want to read about Bella or Edward or Jacob (and for those in the know, Little Miss Loch Ness) endlessly, no matter how boring or ordinary their story got. I don't care that it's popular at the moment. I don't care that teenagers everywhere changing their last names to Cullen. I actually read Twilight before all the hype clouded my judgment and yes, there are some technically irritating facets to Stephenie Meyers writing style but no one can disagree that the way she makes you feel about the characters, the way she bonds them to the reader is powerful to say the least.

What a pity it looks as if they've turned the movie into a awkward sappy teen fest. Damn them.

One thing I will comment on, and I'll try not to give anything vital away, is how Meyer handled the end to her saga. She didn't lose her mind too much. In Harry Potter's ending it was clear to anyone who was familiar with J.K. Rowling that she must have gone a bit batty under the pressure. She was so worried about how to save all her characters that she snapped and killed half the cast within the one last book. It was like everyone expected her to have as little casualties as was believable but over compensated and killed the lot. This is where I am proud of Meyer. She didn't lose her head. Casualties were well thought out and not outragously excessive as in Harry Potter. Rowling killed characters that even though in real life, chances are they would have died, but within the confines of a fantasy novel should never have died at all. Prominent, loved characters that left a huge rift when the series is looked back upon as a hole. Rowling abused the love the readers had formed for these characters. Killing off a few key characters for the story's sake, fine. But killing off as many as she did was just for shocks sake. Unnecessary.

</end useless rant>

Moral to the story. I'm a Twilight nerd... and after looooong long contemplation... I'm team Edward in the end... :aww:

  • Mood: Stunned
  • Reading: Breaking Dawn round 2
  • Watching: Death Note

Devious Comments

love 0 0 joy 0 0 wow 0 0 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0
:icononesixone:
You didn't get hooked on that girly book series too did you :paranoid: Sorry, I know I shouldn't knock what I haven't tried, but from what Bridget tells me it's not my kinda book ^^;

--
"Put your hand on a hot stove for a minute, and it seems like an hour. Sit with a pretty girl for an hour, and it seems like a minute. That's relativity" ~Einstein

*Wicked-LandScapes Have you been wicked?
:iconphotographer-cat:
haha, hey at least sounds like youll make a cohesive argument when doing your librarian teachy thing..
:iconshadowweave:
When I was reading the Harry Potter books the last book stood out to me because every one died (obviously as you’ve written).
To me this set it apart from the normal fantasy of good guys win and bad guys lose, instead going to a story about the sacrifices made for/by those in the story. It didn’t go "the whole nine yards" in the way of The Dirty Dosen or Reservoir Dogs and left at least a few of the main characters still standing for there happily ever after.

The fact that this added a heavy sense of reality to fantasy (causing global grief) can be seen as betrayal to the readers or just emotional writing.
Although this being said I do like the image of J.K Rowling going batty and drawing names out of a hat of people to kill to cheer herself up.

--
Worlds within worlds, our reality is our dream
:iconthe-invisible:
Hahaha, well I didn't realise I was doing a girly thing when I fell in love with the books. I'm so stubborn that if I realised that several thousand teenage girls were gonna go nuts over it I would never have read them in the first place! Alas, now it's too late... guess I am a real girl.

--
One in a million chances crop up nine times out of ten.
:iconthe-invisible:
I'm practicing at pretending to know smart things about books :nerd:

--
One in a million chances crop up nine times out of ten.
:iconthe-invisible:
You are right about the sacrifices part. I guess that felt that Rowling may have forgotten that the majority of her audience were perhaps under 15 (as unintentional as that was) and she should have realised that what she was writing was a little bit more important than herself. She may have wanted to be different and kill off a heap of people but I don't think she should have ignored the fact that there would be children reading completely, regardless of her 'intended' audience.

But yes...it makes me smile to imagine her mad cackle as she killed off Hedwig. =P

--
One in a million chances crop up nine times out of ten.
:icononesixone:
Ah, so you were in before the screaming teenie fangirls then? I can forgive you for that ;)

--
"Put your hand on a hot stove for a minute, and it seems like an hour. Sit with a pretty girl for an hour, and it seems like a minute. That's relativity" ~Einstein

*Wicked-LandScapes Have you been wicked?
:iconthe-invisible:
Yes, the screaming teenie fangirls ruined my nice peaceful conglomerate on the series.

--
I never received my letter from Hogwarts so I'm off to Forks to live with the Cullens.
:iconphotographer-cat:
hahaha fair enoughs...

man...books are pretty great now in comparison to photo things...i have to force myself to do photos, reading is so much easier...

-.-.-.-

MurfandEma

Forum

Shoutbox

=tHe-iNviSibLe:icontHe-iNviSibLe:
hey hey hey...what's with all the touching in my shoutbox! :lol:
Tue Sep 11, 2007, 9:48 PM
~onesixone:icononesixone:
*touches rexamus' shout* Ha! Now what'cha gonna do?
Tue Sep 11, 2007, 6:36 PM
~rexamus:iconrexamus:
yes! my message stands untouched for 5 months....
Sat Jul 28, 2007, 3:01 PM
~rexamus:iconrexamus:
emma is a shit-head.
Tue Mar 20, 2007, 6:25 PM
~tHe-biZarRe:icontHe-biZarRe:
bwah :glomp: ... just cos i feel like it :D
Mon Mar 19, 2007, 2:01 AM
~T-freak:iconT-freak:
bam
Sat Mar 17, 2007, 3:37 AM
~SaCliliad:iconSaCliliad:
Love, love. :heart:
Sat Feb 24, 2007, 10:23 PM
~T-freak:iconT-freak:
boring shoutbox
Wed Feb 21, 2007, 2:41 PM
~rexamus:iconrexamus:
you are all fools... FOOLS I SAY!!
Sun Feb 4, 2007, 3:58 PM
=tHe-iNviSibLe:icontHe-iNviSibLe:
:w00t!:
Sun Jul 3, 2005, 3:58 AM

Site Map